Alone together

We have spent decades building organisations for efficiency. Fewer meetings, more streamlined processes and faster decisions. In that pursuit, many organisations have unintentionally dismantled the foundation of successful leadership. A line through the offsite when budgets shrink. Calendars like traffic jams, with no gap to think, let alone talk. The all-staff meeting becomes an all-staff email. Each change looks rational in isolation, but viewed together they can take away something important.

What is lost is the informal, unscripted connection between people, where trust builds, people make sense of things together, and the foundations of a thriving organisation are either intentionally built or left to chance. When those moments get crowded out, what remains looks like connection but feels hollow from the inside. People are in the same meetings, on the same calls, working towards the same goals, and somehow feel alone together.

Why this happens

The research shows that leaders often fail not because of a lack of skill or effort but because relationships break down, and they break down because building them wasn't the focus. No time for the incidental conversation after the meeting, no space for the informal check-in and no room for the undiscussables, the things people know and feel but never say. And once relationships break down, they can be very slow to repair.

What may be surprising is that senior leaders are often most at risk of this kind of disconnection. They are surrounded by people and still feel alone, caught between the distance that hierarchy creates and the isolation that comes with seniority. The irony is that the leaders most responsible for modelling connection are often the ones who experience it least. For the people around them, you can't be what you can't see.

This is especially damaging when trust between people is low. Decisions stall because no one wants to make the hard or unpopular calls. Problems stay hidden instead of being flagged early, when they're more easily fixed. People stop saying what they think and start managing how they look instead, and the good ones leave, often feeling their voice isn’t valued. Where trust is strong, the opposite happens. Teams feel confident to make tough calls and can take the risks needed for change. Research shows the same connection is often why people stay, and how younger people learn most, through the incidental conversation with someone who knows more than they do. Connection isn't the cherry on the cake. It is the cake.

What makes it worse

Several forces compound this. Technology has given us more ways to communicate, most of them brief and fragmented. Hybrid and distributed work has removed the space that proximity once created, without replacing it with anything deliberate, and working across time zones means meaningful conversations are replaced with messages that are quick to send and easy to misread. Underneath it all is a narrow idea of what counts as work. We notice what we can see and count, and often the value of connection isn't measured, especially when the pressure is on.

How to shift this pattern

Start with how you show up around others. Ask more than you tell, name tension when you feel it and pay attention to whether your actions over time match what you say you value.

Find a shared language for how your group works together, a way of talking aimed at understanding rather than winning, and use it consistently. Something as simple as agreeing how you give feedback or how you make decisions together means leaders spend less time guessing what someone means and more time on the conversation that matters.

Give leaders the experience of working well together, not just the theory of it. A session that lets people practise trust, challenge each other honestly and reflect on how they showed up will do more for a team than any model on a page.

Protect time for people to be together without an agenda. The conversations that build trust rarely happen on a call, and they almost never happen on schedule.

A reflection

Most leaders would say connection matters, but few ask if they have built the conditions for it or whether they have assumed it would happen alongside everything else.

Where in your leadership do you leave connection to chance?

At Nudge we work with leaders and leadership teams through coaching and team coaching. We work with people one to one, with the relationships around them, and with the wider system they sit in. Not a one-off session but sustained work that builds trust, honest conversation, and the kind of relationships that change how a group works together. If this resonates, we'd love to talk.

References

Ambrey, C., Ulichny, J. and Fleming, C. (2017). The Social Connectedness and Life Satisfaction Nexus: A Panel Data Analysis of Women in Australia. Feminist Economics, 23(2).

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2023). Job Satisfaction, Measuring What Matters.

Mentoring programmes: building capacity for learning and retaining workers in the workplace. Journal of Workplace Learning, 35(8).

Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.

Isaacs, W. (1999). Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together. Currency/Doubleday.

Bindi Newman

Bindi Newman is Co-Director of Nudge Leadership and holds a Master of Science in Coaching Psychology. She works with senior leaders on the challenges in front of them and the ones coming next. She also volunteers as a crisis supporter at Lifeline Australia.

Next
Next

As leaders, do we need to be adored?